Determinants
of national diarrheal disease burden (Environmental Science & Technology, 2009) “Diarrheal
illness is a leading cause of child mortality in developing nations. ... We estimate that reducing unmet rural
sanitation need worldwide by 65% would save the equivalent of 1.2 million lives
annually.”
Water, sanitation and hygiene for the prevention of diarrhoea (Int. J. Epidemiol., 2010) “Conclusion: We propose diarrhoea risk
reductions of 48, 17 and 36%, associated respectively, with handwashing with
soap, improved water quality and excreta disposal as the estimates of effect
for the LiST [Lives Saved Tool] model. Most of the evidence is of poor
quality. More trials are needed, but the evidence is nonetheless strong
enough to support the provision of water supply, sanitation and hygiene for
all.”
Impact
of a city-wide sanitation intervention in a large urban centre on social,
environmental and behavioural determinants of childhood diarrhoea: analysis of
two cohort studies (International Journal
of Epidemiology, 2008)
Water, sanitation and hygiene: quantifying the health impact
at national and local levels in countries with incomplete water supply and
sanitation coverage (WHO, 2007)
Water, Sanitation and
Hygiene Interventions to Combat Childhood Diarrhoea in Developing Countries (International
Initiative for Impact Evaluation, 2009)
Rural-urban
migration and child survival in urban Bangladesh: are the urban migrants and
poor disadvantaged? (Journal of Biosocial Science, 2008)
Quote: Housing conditions and
access to safe drinking water and hygienic toilet facilities are the most critical
determinants of child survival in urban areas.
Effect of city-wide sanitation programme on reduction in rate
of childhood diarrhoea in northeast Brazil: assessment by two cohort
studies (The Lancet, 2007)
Effect of water and sanitation on childhood
health in a poor Peruvian peri-urban community (The Lancet, 2004)
Does Access to Water and Sanitation Affect Child Survival? A
Five Country Analysis (background paper for HDR 2006)
A Logistic Analysis of Diarrhea Incidence and Access to Water
and Sanitation (background paper for HDR 2006)
Integrating disease control strategies: balancing water,
sanitation and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrheal disease burden (American
Journal of Public Health, 2007)
Quote:
We found that the benefits of a water quality intervention depend on
sanitation and hygiene conditions. When sanitation conditions are
poor, water quality improvements may have minimal impact regardless
of amount of water contamination.
The impact of improvement of water supply and sanitation
facilities on diarrhea and intestinal parasites: a Brazilian experience with
children in two low-income urban communities (Revista de Saúde Pública,
1989)
Correlation between sanitation conditions and
enteroparasitoses in the population of Assis, São
Paulo State, Brazil
(Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 1999)
Water and
sanitation associated with improved child growth (European Journal of
Clinical Nutrition, 2003)
The impact of poor health on total factor productivity (Journal of Development Studies, 2006)
See also: Sanitation and Disease
Water, health and economics (WHO webpage with links to many
downloadable reports)
− “Assessing the costs
and impacts of different technical and policy actions provides a critical input
to decision taking and policy making. WHO has developed and applied methods to
apply such analysis to water, sanitation and hygiene interventions and has
worked with global and regional partners to undertake and publish studies. A
major area of work is to adapt these methods so that they are appropriate for
use at national and project scales.”
Book:
Environmental Health and Child Survival: Epidemiology, Economics, Experiences (World
Bank, 2008) – here’s what Professor Sandy Cairncross (London School of
Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) has to say: “This rigorous study is a godsend
to anyone involved in advocacy for water and sanitation in developing
countries. Until now, proving that environmental health measures make good
sense economically has been a tricky business. Now this rigorous and detailed
study shows that inadequate environmental health has huge costs to the economy
(about 9 percent of the GDP of typical developing countries) in addition to the
pain and suffering they cause. For politicians who are unmoved by arguments
that failure to invest in water and sanitation will make their people poor,
this study offers a clincher; it shows how lack of investment will also
negatively affect their children’s educational and cognitive performance,
because of the effects of malnutrition, exacerbated by frequent episodes of
illness.”