There are around 1 billion “open defecators”
(i.e., people who have no access to sanitation and so have to defecate in the open) in the developing world
and around two thirds of these “ODers” are in India (further details in the
WHO/UNESCO 2008 report Progress on Drinking-water and Sanitation: Special Focus
on Sanitation).
“Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is
an innovative methodology for mobilising communities to completely eliminate
open defecation. CLTS is characterised by participatory facilitation, community
analysis and action, and no hardware subsidy. In a matter of often just weeks,
communities mobilise themselves to construct latrines and achieve total
sanitation.” [Quote from first link below.]
►CLTS is probably the only way to achieve the MDG sanitation target in rural areas, so it's very important. For dispersed rural communities use Arborloos
− sanitation and income!
Community Led Total
Sanitation (IDS webpage) − a good place to start to learn about CLTS (see Resources for links to many CLTS publications).
Listen: Ending Open Defecation – One Community at a Time
(Think Globally Radio, 2009 − mp3 file)
►The Dynamics and Sustainability of
Community-led Total Sanitation: Mapping Challenges and Pathways (STEPS Centre,
University of Sussex, 2010) −
Quote; “Even though CLTS has the makings of a development success story, many
obstacles remain before it can truly be said to offer a viable route to meeting
the MDGs. For example: How does CLTS accommodate dynamism and complexity
inherent in social-technological-ecological systems? How are women’s,
children’s and men’s often diverging needs accounted for? How can CLTS be
scaled up to become a major force rather than an approach characterised through
piecemeal, scattered projects? Are there lingering assumptions and power
relations that hinder or obstruct the spread of CLTS? In short – how
sustainable is CLTS, and in what ways is the notion of sustainability
understood? This paper offers some perspectives that may help structure
thinking around these questions.”
Beyond Subsidies – Triggering a Revolution in Rural Sanitation [CLTS]
(IDS In Focus Policy Briefing #10, 2009)
Towards Total Sanitation: Socio-cultural Barriers and Triggers to Total
Sanitation in West Africa (WaterAid, 2009)
Taking Community-Led Total Sanitation to Scale: Movement, Spread
and Adaptation (IDS, 2008)
CLTS-Plus: Some
suggestions for strengthening Community-Led Total Sanitation (IRC, 2008)
One fly is deadlier than
a 100 tigers: Total sanitation as a business and community action in Bangladesh
and elsewhere (WSSCC, WSP and SDC, 2008). Watch the presentations (click on ‘Total
Sanitation’ to access the list of presentations).
Subsidy or Self-Respect?
Participatory Total Community Sanitation in Bangladesh (IDS, 2003) − empowering local people to
analyse the extent and risk of environmental pollution caused by open
defecation, and to construct toilets without any external subsidies. Open
defecation has been completely stopped by the community in more than 400
villages in Bangladesh. This new approach demonstrates the impact a simple
facilitative process can have on changing age-old practices, where the onus for
progress is placed almost entirely on the community.
Sanitation Movement Gains Ground in Pakistan (WSP,
2007)
Videos: Awakening
– Total Sanitation in Bangladesh: Part 1 Part 2
Part 3
Shame or subsidy revisited: social mobilization for
sanitation in Orissa, India (Bull. WHO,
2009) – India’s Total Sanitation Campaign
(= CLTS)
Community led
total sanitation (CLTS): Addressing the challenges of scale and sustainability
in rural Africa (Desalination, 2009)
An Evaluation of WaterAid’s CLTS Programme in Nigeria (WaterAid,
2007)
This report defines ‘Total Sanitation’ as:
−Total use of hygienic latrines −
i.e., no open defecation or open/hanging latrine in
use,
−Hygienic latrines well maintained,
−Good personal hygienic practices,
−Using sandals when defecating,
−Effective hand washing after
defecation and before taking or handling food,
−Water points well managed,
−Safe water use for all domestic
purposes,
−Food and water covered,
−Garbage disposal in a fixed place
and domestic animal excreta disposed of in a
hygienic way,
−Waste water disposal in a hygienic
way,
−Clean courtyards and roadsides, and
−No spitting in public places.
►If all this is done, rural people will have a
hugely improved quality of life.
|
|
A WORD OF CAUTION!
Moving Beyond Open Defecation Free Sanitation in
Pakistan
From: WSP Access Newsletter, October 2009
Pakistan has taken an important step
towards improved sanitation through a major sector assessment and setting up of
a core group that seeks to move communities beyond open defecation free (ODF)
status. The Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach has already enabled
more than 1,500 villages in Pakistan to achieve ODF status and is expected to
reach 15,000 villages by June 2011. This will mean that a third of the rural
population of Pakistan would be covered.
To consolidate this progress and
scale up learning, a Core Group was formed in August 2008 to advise the
government in policy refinement and implementation of its nation-wide sanitation
policy. The Core Group includes senior officials from the key national
ministries of Environment and Health, as well as Provincial Planning and
Development Departments and international agencies, including WSP. The group
commissioned an assessment of CLTS pilots in nine villages in the country. The
evidence gathered revealed that CLTS had the potential to motivate communities
to achieve ODF status. However, it did not create demand for "improved
sanitation," which, according to the Joint Monitoring Program, implies use of
sanitation facilities "that ensure hygienic separation of human excreta from
human contact". The surveyed communities were found using unimproved and
unhygienic latrines without taking any substantial effort to upgrade or replace
damaged latrines due to limited knowledge of different latrine options
available at the household level. A countrywide CLTS implementation
strategy will be developed based on the recommendations of the review, and is
likely to benefit all communities living in rural areas by 2015. [Emphasis added]
|
|
International
Glossary of Shit (CLTS, undated) – “In CLTS, the crude local
word for shit is always used, cutting through the deadly silence around open
defecation.”